Tomorrow
the History Channel will air Part 1 of a ten-hour series called The Bible, which is a joint effort of actress Roma Downey and producer Mark
Burnett, who are husband and wife.
I
first learned of the series on The O’Reilly
Factor, when Downey and Burnett were guests on the show.
I
was initially surprised to learn that a series about the bible was going to be
airing on the History Channel, although in hindsight perhaps I shouldn’t have
been. It’s just that so many people dispute the events depicted in the bible as
historical, and I wouldn’t expect the History Channel to disagree. But then
again, Clash
of the Gods is a History Channel show, too, and nobody believes that Hercules
actually existed, right?
Nevertheless,
my first thought was, “Well, I guess they’ll stick to those things that most
scholars agree are based in fact,” and then I caught a piece of the trailer
where Moses parts the Red Sea, and I said to myself “Or maybe not.”
Now
don’t get me wrong. I’m a Christian and more conservative than not. I believe
that the miracles documented in the bible occurred. I was just taken aback to
see that a secular television channel is on my side. (Or should I say God’s
side?)
Bill
O’Reilly, however, is not on my side. After Downey said that she’d been a
believer her whole life, O’Reilly said, “Alright, when you say you’re a
believer… do you believe in the bible literally? I mean, do you believe that
Adam and Eve were out there … and uh … the snake and the apple and all of that
business?”
Downey
responded that she did believe in the bible literally, and O’Reilly seemed put
out by that. Next, he directed a question at Burnett, “Look, a lot of the bible,
Mr. Burnett, is allegorical, and we know that in creationism and things like
that. So what you’re doing here, I assume, is just telling the story the way that
the prophets put forth without any commentary added to it, is that correct?”
Burnett
responded in the affirmative, confirming that he and Downey were portraying the
bible as written, just the facts. And again, O’Reilly seemed dissatisfied with
the answer. He said, “Now are you telling people that they should believe in
Adam and Eve? That they should believe in Noah’s ark … Jonah and the whale… Are
you telling people that this is the way to go?”
I
mean, just what is this man’s problem? How many times and in how many ways do
Downey and Burnett have to tell him that they believe in the literal Word of
God? Plenty of Christians do. Obviously he doesn’t. Bully for him. (And by the
way, I’m not making any assumptions here. The next evening he responded to a
viewer criticism by saying something along the lines of “If you want to believe
that Jonah was swallowed by an actual
whale, that’s your prerogative.”)
Then
came the piece de resistance. O’Reilly
plugged his upcoming book, Killing Jesus,
and he tells Downey that it’s a history book. Then he goes on to say, “But
obviously the Gospels that discuss this are … were involved with that…. but
there are some contradictions among Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John …” Geez. O’Reilly
is stuttering all over himself, seemingly unable to believe that Downey and
Burnett have fallen prey to this foolishness.
Downey
and Burnett handled themselves beautifully, and I’m proud to call them my
brother and sister in Christ. But O’Reilly’s position really puzzled me. I’ve
watched his show for a while, and he’s always talking about being a Christian
and God and morals and ethics and all that stuff, and then when two Christians
tell him they believe in the miracles of the bible he gets thrown off. I’d be the first to admit that not all Christians agree about everything written in the bible, but I’m hard pressed to understand
what, as Christians, we have other than the Word on which to base our faith. So
if O’Reilly doesn’t believe that Jonah was swallowed by an actual whale, what does he believe? And how does he know he can
believe it? Just asking.
No comments:
Post a Comment