I was watching a docudrama about Diane Pikul, who was
murdered by her cross-dressing husband, Joe Pikul, on the theory that Diane had
threatened to expose Joe’s secret to the community, his coworkers, and his
family.
Diane Pikul had been estranged from Joe Pikul, and her
divorce attorney Raoul Felder
commented during the docudrama that you really can’t know anybody.
I agree with him to a point. I don't think it's possible to know
someone who doesn’t want to be known. And, in my experience, this definition fits a lot of people.
I remember sitting with my mother as we listened to the news
reports about Scott Peterson,
and she saying “Damn! Women all over the country are going to be looking at
their husbands cross-eyed now,” because none of Peterson’s friends could
believe he’d committed such a horrific crime. In fact, to this day, the ScottPetersonappeal.org website claims
his innocence.
Because Peterson, it turns out, is one of those people who
don’t want to be known.
Not wanting to be known is not about seeking a quiet, solitary life during which you more or
less mind your own business. Instead, not wanting to be known is about not
wanting people to know what makes you tick and instead preferring to keep your
motivations, your true worldview, and your true opinions under wraps. I suppose there are as many reasons for
someone to adopt this raison
d'etre as there are people, but unless you are a sociopath, I don’t understand this real well because my personality
falls way on the other side of the spectrum, and I’m always trying to tell everyone
darn near everything about what makes me tick. I think life is more interesting
that way.
At the same time, I appreciate the complexity of human
nature and don’t normally take my ability to know someone for granted. Which isn’t to say that I can’t be surprised
or hurt by someone’s behavior that I didn’t exactly see coming, it’s just that
I understand that people aren’t always what they seem.
I’d been thinking about this before I saw the docudrama,
actually, because of an exchange I’d had a few weeks earlier with a new friend
and professional colleague.
I’d forwarded my friend a resume I’d received from a young lady
who told me she wanted to get into HR. This young lady knows a relative of
mine, and upon hearing of her interest in HR, my relative agreed to make an introduction
for whatever help I could provide.
I asked my friend to share the resume with her HR network,
and she responded by asking how well I knew the person.
Now, anyone who knows me
knows that I tend to overthink my responses to what others would consider
simple questions, but so what?
So, anyway I responded that she worked with my relative,
she’d graduated from thus and such school, and she was looking to get into HR.
At which point my friend said something like, “I can see that from the resume.
I want to know what she’s like as a person,”
and I thought to myself, “Hell, I don’t know what you’re like as a person,” and the question just struck me as funny.
So I guess my point in all this is that if you’ve ever been
fooled by someone because you thought she was one thing and then it turns out
she was something else entirely, it doesn’t necessarily follow that you’re a
rotten judge of character. Some people just go out of their way to not let you see their true colors. Like
Pikul did. Like Peterson still does. It’s the way they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment